SEISEI INSIGHTS — Cross-border Compliance
"Move the People, or Move the Structure?" — What to Clarify Before Considering a Move to Singapore or Hong Kong
2026-06-25
"A friend moved the company to Singapore and says there's no estate tax and no capital gains tax there — is that true?" We are asked this repeatedly. As a matter of fact, both Singapore and Hong Kong have abolished estate (inheritance) tax, and neither, in principle, taxes gains on the disposal of shares. The structural gap with Japan is indeed large. But the question "should I move too?" requires one distinction first: is it the people you move, or the structure? These are entirely different questions.
The Structural Difference
Rate details vary by country and tax year, but the differences worth grasping structurally are these three:
| Issue | Japan | Singapore / Hong Kong |
|---|---|---|
| Estate (inheritance) tax | Yes (high top rate) | None (both abolished) |
| Tax on gains from shares | Taxed in principle | Not taxed in principle |
| Scope of taxation | Residents taxed on worldwide income (Income Tax Act, Art. 7(1)(i)) | Closer in principle to a domestic-source / remittance basis |
Where Japan taxes at every stage — earning, holding, and passing on — Singapore and Hong Kong impose structurally lighter burdens at the disposal and succession stages. That is the backdrop to why relocation comes up at all.
But "Moving the People" Has a Price
Relocating people carries issues that are easily overlooked:
- Exit tax (taxation on departure from Japan). A resident holding qualifying securities above a threshold (¥100 million or more in aggregate) who has lived in Japan for a certain period is taxed on unrealized gains upon leaving the country (Income Tax Act, Art. 60-2).
- CRS (Common Reporting Standard). If assets sit in both the destination and Japan / the home country, account information is exchanged automatically, and filing in both countries becomes the premise.
- Substance requirements. Singapore's fund incentives require genuine local management activity; a name-only setup does not meet them.
- Cost of living. Housing, international schools, and employment costs can exceed Tokyo's.
Three Options
Organized, the choices fall broadly into three:
1. Move both the people and the structure — the family relocates and changes its tax-residency status itself. This carries the price of giving up Japan's advantages in living, education, healthcare, and residence status, and presupposes a substantial asset base and a business that can be managed remotely.
2. Move only the structure, keep the people in Japan — establish a fund or management company in Singapore. But if the individual remains a Japan resident, worldwide taxation still applies, and the controlled-foreign-company rules (CFC, Act on Special Measures Concerning Taxation, Art. 66-6) are reviewed strictly. Unless specific exemption requirements are met, the low local tax is pulled back in on the Japan side, and the expected benefit is largely eroded.
3. Don't move; maximize the tools within Japan — combine a holding company, family entities, trusts, insurance, and gifting to put the structure in order while remaining in Japan. No relocation, no exit tax.
In our experience, the realistic starting point for most families in Japan is the third. Only where the asset base is large enough and a change in lifestyle is acceptable does the first become a genuine option. The second looks attractive but, because of CFC and worldwide taxation, its tax benefit tends to be limited.
"Preparing" and "Acting" Are Not the Same
The wiser course is to put the structure in order within Japan first, so that you can act if and when relocation truly becomes necessary. Domestic optimization requires no move. And if, in future, a change in asset scale or family circumstances leads you to relocate, the structure built in Japan (the holding company, the trust) need not be dismantled — it keeps operating; only your personal tax-residency status changes. Preparing is not the same as acting. But without preparation, the option itself never arises — that is the heart of the relocation question. The specific design must be developed together with a licensed professional versed in international taxation.
This article provides general information on tax systems and does not constitute individual tax consultation. Specific filings and tax computations are handled by licensed partner tax accountants whom we introduce.
<!-- GATE1 核验 (japan-law-db, 2026-06-25): 所得税法第7条第1項第1号(居住者全世界所得課税)=DB确认(law_id=7); 所得税法第60条の2(国外転出時課税/出国税, 有価証券等合計1億円以上の要件・5年/10年居住要件を本文確認)=DB确认(law_id=7); 租税特別措置法第66条の6(外国子会社合算税制/CFC)=DB确认(law_id=1649)。GATE1-FLAG: 源文の税率比較表(日本所得税55%/法人税23.2%/譲渡益20.315%/シンガポール22%/香港15%等)は日本法令DB対象外かつ年度により変動、特にシンガポール個人所得税最高税率は近年改定されており源文の数値が現行と一致しない可能性が高いため、具体的数値の比較表を削除し構造的(有無ベース)比較に一般化した。SG/HKの相続税廃止(SG2008/HK2006)・13O/13U等の具体数値も外部情報のため割愛。 -->